Proceed to cart Product added to cart
Recommended also
US M-1967 magazine pouch,  surplus

US M-1967 magazine pouch, surplus

Price 18.99 USD excluding VAT
Price in toilet paper rolls approximately 65 toilet paper rolls. We do not yet accept toilet paper as payment.

During the Vietnam war, heavy canvas webbing evolved into its lightweight nylon successors. These magazine pouches are meant for 20 rnd M16 magazines.

  • This product will not be restocked.
Add to cart
Add to wish list
Trouble with the metric system? Try our converter:
cm = 0' 0" or 0" and
feet  inches = 0 cm

During the Vietnam war, heavy canvas webbing evolved into its lightweight nylon successors. These magazine pouches are meant for 20 rnd M16 magazines.

Unlike the M-1956 Universal magazine pouches, these were specifically meant for the 20-round M16 magazines. Each pouch takes 4 magazines, although we've heard you could shove even five in there. Two M14 magazines will also fit.

Normally, these pouches have all kinds of straps, which were apparently not too popular among the troops as many of those have been cut off. All the important stuff is still present, of course.

In used but perfectly serviceable condition.

Recommendations

Loading products...

Reviews

You have already submitted a review. You can edit your text by clicking on it.

Log in and write a review.

Remove filter
1
100 %
recommends
5 / 5
1 ratings
I would recommend for a friend

28.11.2016 (Edited 31.03.2017)
Great little pouches for anyone with the shorter 20-rd AR type magazines.

Very compact design & great for attaching to Alice packs, etc.
2 0 Report abuse

Comments

Comment and discuss the product with other Varusteleka regular users. If you wish to ask us anything, please click on the message button on the right side of the page. You can also send us email or call us! Log in and join the conversation.

Please report this text if for example:

  • Text is wildly obscene or completely irrelevant.
  • The reviewer has not actually used the product he is reviewing.

If you strongly disagree with this text, please press thumb down button.

Thank you!

Cancel
Loading...